GCSE Philosophy and Ethics Practice Exam

What is an argument against the idea that the laws of nature restrict the possibility of religious experiences?

1. God is an omniscient being

2. Religious experiences are always scientifically testable

3. God is an omnipotent being not bound by the laws of nature

4. Religious experiences only occur during historical periods

The correct answer is: God is an omniscient being

The choice stating that God is an omnipotent being not bound by the laws of nature presents a strong argument against the idea that natural laws limit religious experiences. The concept of omnipotence suggests that God possesses unlimited power and capacity to act independently of any constraints, including the laws of nature. This perspective supports the view that, if God chooses to intervene in the world or engage with individuals, such occurrences are possible regardless of the established laws that govern natural phenomena. In contrast, other options might not capture the essence of the argument effectively. For instance, the idea of God being omniscient relates more to knowledge than power and does not directly address the potential of religious experiences. The assertion that religious experiences are always scientifically testable implies a limitation that doesn't necessarily correlate with the belief in divine power. Lastly, stating that religious experiences only occur during specific historical periods focuses on temporal limitations rather than a challenge to the interaction between the divine and natural laws.