GCSE Philosophy and Ethics Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for your GCSE Philosophy and Ethics Exam with our comprehensive multiple-choice quizzes and flashcards. Each question includes hints and detailed explanations to enhance your learning and improve your exam readiness. Start practicing now!

Start Multiple Choice Practice Test
Start Flash Cards

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What is one reason given against using miracles as proof of God's existence?

  1. Miracles ultimately mean God exists

  2. Coincidences or unusual events do sometimes occur

  3. Scientific explanations are never needed

  4. All miracles have natural explanations

The correct answer is: Miracles ultimately mean God exists

One reason against using miracles as proof of God's existence is because coincidences or unusual events do sometimes occur. This means that not every unusual occurrence or extraordinary event can be attributed to a higher power. Additionally, it is important to consider that scientific explanations are sometimes needed and can provide a more logical understanding of such events. Just because a miracle may not have a scientific explanation at the moment, it does not mean that it is proof of God's existence. Therefore, relying solely on miracles as proof can be a weak argument.

More Questions Like This